4.5 Article

A Permanent Magnet Assembling Approach to Mitigate the Cogging Torque for Permanent Magnet Machines Considering Manufacturing Uncertainties

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15062154

关键词

motor design; robust assembling approach; combination sequence of uncertainties; cogging torque reduction; PM uncertainties

资金

  1. National Key RD Program China [2017YFB0102400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an approach to mitigate the cogging torque of permanent magnet machines by combining uncertainties in a specific sequence, achieving stable performance without significant cost increase.
Conventionally, the small mean and variance of peak-to-peak cogging torque of permanent magnet (PM) machines considering manufacturing uncertainties can be achieved by a robust design or by reducing the uncertainties range. However, the consequent compromise of other design objectives or the increase in the manufacturing costs are frequently inevitable. In this paper, the combination sequence of the uncertainties is highlighted and implemented to achieve a stable performance even for a non-robust design without increasing the cost too much. A PM assembling approach is proposed to mitigate the influences of PM uncertainties on cogging torque by means of combining the uncertainties in a particular sequence, where the effects of uncertainties would counteract each other. Both the singular type of PM uncertainties and the combined ones are considered in the assembling approach. Furthermore, the proposed approach is verified by comparing the cogging torque performance with PM randomly assembled models, where several hundreds of models featuring different uncertainties are calculated through the finite element method. The proposed approach is discussed, particularly for the application of mass production and a small amount of prototypes. Two prototypes with different PM assembling sequences are fabricated and further verify the effectiveness of the proposed PM assembling approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据