4.5 Article

Spotted Hyena Optimization Method for Harvesting Maximum PV Power under Uniform and Partial-Shade Conditions

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15082850

关键词

maximum power point tracking (MPPT); optimization; partial shading; perturb-and-observe algorithm (P&O); photovoltaic (PV) array; solar energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new bioinspired optimization algorithm, called Spotted-Hyena Optimizer (SHO), is proposed for maximum power-point tracking of partially shaded photovoltaic arrays. The algorithm is easy to implement and does not require additional parameter tuning. The results show that SHO achieves faster global convergence compared to traditional perturb-and-observe (P&O) and particle-swarm-optimization (PSO) methods.
Maximum power-point-tracking techniques applied for partially shaded photovoltaic array yield maximum power output via operating the panel at its most efficient voltage. Considering the noticeable issues existing with the available methods, including steady-state oscillations, poor tracking capability and complex procedures, a new bioinspired Spotted-Hyena Optimizer (SHO) is proposed. It follows simple implementation steps, and does not require additional controller-parameter tuning to track the optimal power point. To validate the versatility of the proposed method, the SHO algorithm is applied to track the maximum power of different string arrangements under six partial-shade conditions. Further, to authenticate SHO's methods, its results are compared with perturb-and-observe (P&O), and particle-swarm-optimization (PSO) methods. As a result of its implementation, it is observed that the tracking speed of SHO towards the global convergence for four patterns under 4S2P are 0.34 s, 0.24 s, 0.2 s, and 0.3 s, which is far less than the PSO and P&O methods. Further, to demonstrate its suitability, a hardware prototype is built and tested for various operating conditions. The experimental results are in good agreement with the simulated values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据