4.5 Article

De-Risking Solar Receivers to Achieve SunShot Targets

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15072508

关键词

Concentrating Solar-thermal Power; CSP; Solar Receiver; Solar Reactor; SunShot; Thermal Systems; Gen3 CSP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Concentrating solar thermal systems offer the flexibility to integrate with thermal energy storage, allowing for continuous production of electricity, process heat, and chemical products. The solar receiver, a crucial component, imposes limitations on system performance. Successfully translating research innovations into viable components requires a comprehensive development approach.
Concentrating solar thermal (CST) systems are unique among renewable energy options for the ease of integration with thermal energy storage (TES). This enables dispatchable (or continuous) production of electricity, process heat, solar fuels, or other chemical products. The solar receiver in a CST system converts concentrated sunlight to transportable thermal energy. In solar power towers, the solar receiver's physical limitations are often the constraining conditions for the system; they restrict maximum temperature, maximum solar concentration, or controllable chemical production. It is also a uniquely challenging component to prototype and test at sizes beyond the laboratory scale. Transitioning exceptional research innovations into viable components for an integrated system and ultimately leading to CST market adoption requires a multiscale vision for component de-risking and development. Technical requirements for holistic novel receiver development are reviewed based on learnings from the US Department of Energy's (USDOE) SunShot Initiative, its active Third Generation of Concentrating Solar Power Systems (Gen3 CSP) program, and anticipation of requirements for future high value applications for CST. Context and learnings from the Gen3 CSP program are provided to exemplify successful receiver risk-reduction paradigms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据