4.6 Article

Understanding efficient phosphorus-functionalization of graphite for vanadium flow batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 409, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.139971

关键词

Vanadium redox flow battery; Electrocatalytic activity; Graphite electrode; Phosphorus doping; Surface functionalization

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [03EK3053C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed commercial and synthetic phosphorus-doped graphene and graphite felt (GF), and found that a low phosphorus concentration and high degree of graphitization can increase catalytic activity. Based on these findings, the GF was modified, resulting in a twofold increase in power density in full cell tests.
Numerous surface treatment methods are known to enhance the electrochemical activity of graphite felt (GF), such as thermal activation or attachment of nanoparticulate catalysts. The integration of heteroatoms into the graphite lattice at the surface could be a promising technique for reliable and efficient electrode activation. However, these functionalization techniques are based on thermochemical activation, which makes it difficult to distinguish between activity effects other than foreign atom integration, such as defects and other surface groups that must be considered. In this work, we analyzed commercial and synthetic phosphorus-doped graphene and GF using different electrochemical and physicochemical techniques. Despite a high doping concentration, the activity of the commercial powder bonded to GF and coated on glassy carbon remained limited due to the low degree of graphitization and high oxygen content. Instead, a low phosphorus concentration of <1 at% combined with a high degree of graphitization increased the catalytic activity. Building on these findings, GF was rationally modified, resulting in twice the power density compared to the original material in full cell tests. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据