4.7 Article

miR-296-5p promotes autophagy in mouse LS8 cells under excessive fluoride via AMPK/ULK1 pathways

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113362

关键词

MiR-296-5p; Autophagy; Fluoride; AMPK; ULK1

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81773369]
  2. Science and Tech-nology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [16ZR1430600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that overexpression of miR-296-5p can accelerate autophagy in fluoride-induced dental fluorosis, while its underexpression has an inhibitory effect on autophagy. MiR-296-5p may improve the secretion of autophagic mediators by activating AMPK/ULK1 expression, suggesting it as a potential therapeutic target under high fluoride stimulation.
Numerous microRNAs participate in regulating the pathological process of autophagy. We have found miR296-5p is one of the most significantly down-regulated microRNAs in a high concentration of sodium fluoride. However, it is not clear whether miR-296-5p augments autophagy in dental fluorosis. Our purpose is to explore the function of miR-296-5p in regulating autophagy of excessive fluoride development. Thus, the cell line of ameloblasts LS8 was exposed to a 1.5 mM dose of NaF and miR-296-5p-mimics, Real-time qPCR, CCK-8 assays, Fluorescence imaging and Western blot analysis were performed. Autophagy was observed. As our results indicated, miR-296-5p overexpression in mouse LS8 cells significantly accelerated autophagy. The autophagy inhibition effect of miR-296-5p underexpression was consistent with the effect of the AMPK inhibitor. And we found that the expression of LC3II was decreased via down-regulation of AMPK. The change of ULK1 by miR296-5p may be accomplished through AMPK. Thus, miR-296-5p may improve the secretion of autophagic mediators by activating AMPK/ULK1 expression in fluorosis, suggesting that miR-296-5p, AMPK/ULK1 may be potential therapeutic targets under the higher fluoride stimulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据