4.7 Article

Predicting current and future distributions of Mentha pulegium L. in Tunisia under climate change conditions, using the MaxEnt model

期刊

ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101533

关键词

Mentha pulegium; Climate change; Potential distribution; MaxEnt; Suitable habitat; Tunisia

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used the MaxEnt model to predict the future distribution of Mentha pulegium in Tunisia. The results showed that suitable habitats for this medicinal plant would decrease and shift toward the east due to climate change.
Climate change and human activities have caused the degeneration of the natural habitats of medicinal plants. Mentha pulegium L. is one of the most common medicinal plants in Tunisia that features high economic and ecological values. Predicting species' suitable habitats, through modeling, has evolved as a useful tool for the assessment of resource conservation to protect medicinal plants. Herein, we used MaxEnt model to predict current and future distributions of M. pulegium under two representative concentration pathways (RCP2.6 and RCP8.5) for the years 2050 and 2070. MaxEnt modeling was in the Excellent category since all the AUCs were above 0.9. Results showed that high and moderate suitable habitats for the current distribution of M. pulegium encompassed ca. 9929 km2 and 16,423 km2, respectively. These areas are mainly located in North Tunisia. Precipitation of the coldest quarter (Bio19) was identified as the most critical factor shaping M. pulegium distribution. Compared to the current distribution, the highly and moderately suitable areas for M. pulegium under the two RCPs (RCP2.6 and RCP8.5) would decrease in the 2050s and 2070s. The model projected a shift of the suitable area from Northeastward to Center-eastward. These results may provide a useful tool for developing adaptive management strategies to enhance M. pulegium protection and sustainable utilization in the context of global climate change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据