4.7 Article

Developing policy packages for low-carbon passenger transport: A mixed methods analysis of trade-offs and synergies

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
卷 193, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107304

关键词

Climate change; Passenger transport; Mitigation; Policy package; Distributional effects; CGE

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [W1256]
  2. Austrian Climate and Energy Fund [KR16AC0K13367, KR18AC0K14664]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study analyzes the economic, environmental, and distributional effects of a policy package supporting low-carbon passenger transport in Austria, emphasizing the importance of a balanced policy package. It also highlights potential urban-rural conflicts, regressive impacts, and negative public budget implications of individual policy measures, issues that can be mitigated by the suggested policy package as a whole.
Transformation to climate neutrality of the transport sector raises multiple challenges at a time, with potentially conflicting objectives and further external effects. This calls for a balanced policy package of which empirical assessment is needed in order to i) quantify its effectiveness and ii) reveal effects of potential overlaps and in-teractions associated with individual measures within the package. This paper analyses the economic, envi-ronmental and distributional effects of a policy package that supports low-carbon passenger transport in Austria, co-developed with policy experts and stakeholders. The package includes hard measures such as a mandated phase-out of conventional cars and explicit road pricing, as well as soft measures to foster the uptake of public transportation. To assess these packages we make use of a computable general equilibrium model for Austria that incorporates heterogeneous household groups, CO2 emissions and a detailed representation of the transport sector. We show that the decoupling of economic welfare and negative external effects of passenger transport is possible with a balanced policy package. Our analysis also highlights potential urban-rural conflicts, regressive impacts and negative public budget implications of single policy measures, issues that the suggested policy package as a whole can mitigate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据