4.5 Article

A framework for operationalizing the assessment of post-earthquake functional recovery of buildings

期刊

EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 1972-2007

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/87552930221081538

关键词

Functional recovery; reoccupancy; recovery time; performance-based engineering; performance objectives

资金

  1. NIST Disaster Resilience Grant [70NANB19H058]
  2. FEMA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a method to assess post-earthquake building performance and reoccupancy, aiming to reduce vulnerability and facilitate recovery. The method maps component damage states to building performance states through fault tree analysis and estimates the time needed for repairs using a repair scheduling algorithm.
Building damage after an earthquake, or other hazard event, can interrupt businesses, displace households, and significantly disrupt a community for years. As a result, policymakers and engineers are working toward new design guidelines and policies that reduce the vulnerability of the built environment through improved building functional recovery performance. This study proposes a method for assessing post-earthquake building performance states of function and reoccupancy within the architecture of performance-based earthquake engineering, targeted at US construction, making use of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) P-58 fragility and consequence models. This is accomplished by mapping component damage states to systems-level operational performance, and then to building-level performance states, through a series of fault trees. The study also proposes a repair scheduling algorithm to estimate the time taken to restore building reoccupancy or function, considering impeding factors that delay the start of repairs. The result is a probabilistic approach that extends the performance-based engineering framework to explicitly quantify post-earthquake building function performance states, thus facilitating design and mitigation decisions for recovery-based performance objectives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据