4.6 Article

Probabilistic residual deformation prediction model for rectangular reinforced concrete columns

期刊

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS
卷 51, 期 9, 页码 1994-2015

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3650

关键词

demolition fragility; probabilistic model; rectangular reinforced concrete columns; residual deformation

资金

  1. Regional Customized Disaster-Safety R&D Program - Ministry of Interior and Safety (MOIS, Korea) [20011127]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20011127] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a probabilistic model for estimating the nonlinear response and demolition probability of reinforced concrete structures. The proposed model better represents the central tendency of observed residual deformations compared to deterministic models.
This paper presents a probabilistic residual deformation prediction model for estimating the nonlinear response and demolition probability of reinforced concrete structures. An empirical relation between the residual deformation and column physical parameters was formulated from experimental observations. The accuracy of the proposed model was compared to those of three deterministic models available in the literature. The proposed model better represented the central tendency of the observed residual deformations than the prediction of the deterministic models. Nonlinear dynamic analyses using 44 far-field ground motions on a modern four-story reinforced concrete building frame are conducted to investigate discrepancies in demolition probability associated with different residual deformation models. The difference between the medians of demolition fragility predicted by the deterministic and probabilistic models was 20-50%, indicating that the probabilistic model has a significantly higher dispersion than that of the deterministic models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据