4.7 Article

Nano-liposomal zein hydrolysate for improved apoptotic activity and therapeutic index in lung cancer treatment

期刊

DRUG DELIVERY
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 1049-1059

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2022.2057618

关键词

Liposome; zein; hydrolysate; apoptosis; lung cancer

资金

  1. Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran [63810]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (MSIT) [2019R1A5A2027340, 2021R1A2C2007937]
  3. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety of South Korea in 2021-2025 [21153MFDS607]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of zein hydrolysate and nano-liposomal zein hydrolysate on human lung cancer cells, and found that nano-liposomal zein hydrolysate exhibited higher cytotoxicity and anticancer effects.
Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world with a high mortality rate. Zein is a protein compound whose protein isolate is not useful and whose protein hydrolysis produces biological activity. By encapsulating this bioactive compound inside the nanoparticles (NPs), it causes itself to reach the tumor site and destroy it rapidly. In this study, the effects of zein hydrolysate (ZH) and nano-liposomal ZH (N-ZH) were investigated on the human A549 cell line. Western blotting and cell cycle analyses showed that ZH and N-ZH caused cytotoxicity. They induced apoptosis via cell cycle arrest at the G0 phase, as well as significant increases in pro-apoptotic genes, such as Bax, caspase-3, -8, -9, and p53, accompanied with significant decreases in the anti-apoptotic marker Bcl-2. Based on the results, the cytotoxic and anticancer effects of N-ZH were higher than those of free ZH. In conclusion, liposomes improved the performance of ZH and dramatically reduced the IC50 value of ZH. These findings provided the experimental evidence that N-ZH with favorable anticancer activity can be used as a therapeutic agent and strategy for lung cancer treatment in future clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据