4.4 Article

Suicidal motivations among opioid overdose survivors: Replication and extension

期刊

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
卷 235, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109437

关键词

Opioid use disorder; Overdose; Suicide; Suicide prevention; Self-injury mortality

资金

  1. NIDA [DA046521]
  2. Charles Engelhard Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Desire to die is common among individuals with opioid use disorder before nonfatal opioid overdose, with approximately 1 in 5 people with a history of overdose reporting intention to die prior to their most recent overdose. This population also tends to underestimate the risk of overdose. Careful assessment of suicidal cognition may help improve prevention of opioid overdose deaths.
Background: Several studies suggest suicidal motivation may contribute to opioid overdose fatalities in people with opioid use disorder. In this study, we sought to replicate and extend prior findings suggesting that a desire to die is common prior to nonfatal opioid overdose in people with opioid use disorder. Methods: Adults receiving inpatient detoxification and stabilization who reported a history of opioid overdose (N = 60) completed questions about suicidal cognition prior to their most recent overdose. Results: Approximately 45% reported some desire to die prior to their most recent overdose, with 20% reporting they had some intention to die. The correlation between these ratings was of a moderate magnitude (rho = 0.58). Almost 40% of the sample perceived no risk of overdose prior to their most recent overdose event, suggesting a significant underestimation of risk in this population. Conclusions: Desire to die was common in adults with opioid use disorder prior to nonfatal opioid overdose events, and 1 in 5 people with a history of opioid overdose reported intention to die prior to their most recent opioid overdose. Careful assessment of suicidal cognition in this population may improve prevention of opioid overdose deaths.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据