4.0 Article

ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2022 update)

期刊

DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
卷 144, 期 3, 页码 165-177

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-022-09872-0

关键词

Clinical standards; Electroretinogram (ERG); Full-field ERG; International Society of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This document presents an updated and revised ISCEV Standard for clinical electroretinogram (ERG) testing. It specifies minimum protocols for ERG stimuli, recording methods, and reporting to ensure consistency and facilitate diagnosis, monitoring, and inter-laboratory comparisons. The main changes include allowing ERGs to meet the Standard without mydriasis and providing more detail on analyzing oscillatory potentials (OPs).
The full-field electroretinogram (ERG) is a mass electrophysiological response to diffuse flashes of light and is used widely to assess generalized retinal function. This document, from the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV), presents an updated and revised ISCEV Standard for clinical ERG testing. Minimum protocols for basic ERG stimuli, recording methods and reporting are specified, to promote consistency of methods for diagnosis, monitoring and inter-laboratory comparisons, while also responding to evolving clinical practices and technology. The main changes in this updated ISCEV Standard for clinical ERGs include specifying that ERGs may meet the Standard without mydriasis, providing stimuli adequately compensate for non-dilated pupils. There is more detail about analysis of dark-adapted oscillatory potentials (OPs) and the document format has been updated and supplementary content reduced. There is a more detailed review of the origins of the major ERG components. Several tests previously tabulated as additional ERG protocols are now cited as published ISCEV extended protocols. A non-standard abbreviated ERG protocol is described, for use when patient age, compliance or other circumstances preclude ISCEV Standard ERG testing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据