4.3 Article

New insights into the DNA repair pathway choice with NuA4/TIP60

期刊

DNA REPAIR
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2022.103315

关键词

Double-strand break; Histone modifications; Chromatin remodeling; NuA4; TIP60; SAGA

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [FDN-143314]
  2. Cancer Research Society [25123]
  3. Genome Quebec
  4. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec-Sante (FRQS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In eukaryotic cells, DNA double-strand breaks can be repaired through nonhomologous end-joining or homologous recombination. The choice of repair pathway is regulated by antagonistic relationship between repair factors specific to each pathway and is dependent on the cell cycle. The molecular mechanisms of this decision involve post-translational modifications of chromatin surrounding the break. Recent advances have focused on the function of the NuA4/TIP60 histone acetyltransferase/chromatin remodeling complex in DSBs repair, particularly its collaboration with the SAGA acetyltransferase complex and their role in regulating chromatin dynamics, DNA end resection, and recombination.
In eukaryotic cells, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can be repaired through two main pathways, nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). The selection of the repair pathway choice is governed by an antagonistic relationship between repair factors specific to each pathway, in a cell cycledependent manner. The molecular mechanisms of this decision implicate post-translational modifications of chromatin surrounding the break. Here, we discuss the recent advances regarding the function of the NuA4/ TIP60 histone acetyltransferase/chromatin remodeling complex during DSBs repair. In particular, we emphasise the contribution of NuA4/TIP60 in repair pathway choice, in collaboration with the SAGA acetyltransferase complex, and how they regulate chromatin dynamics, modify non-histone substrates to allow DNA end resection and recombination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据