4.5 Article

Osteoblast lineage Sod2 deficiency leads to an osteoporosis-like phenotype in mice

期刊

DISEASE MODELS & MECHANISMS
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dmm.049392

关键词

Skeletal aging; Osteoporosis; Mitochondrial dysfunction; Reactive oxygen species; Senescence

资金

  1. Collaborative Research Center 1149, Danger Response, Disturbance Factors and Regenerative Potential after Acute Trauma project - Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) [251293561, C01 INST 40/491-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteoporosis is a common disease associated with oxidative stress, and the decrease of SOD2 may lead to bone loss and osteoporosis.
Osteoporosis is a systemic metabolic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and strength associated with fragility fractures. Oxidative stress, which results from elevated intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and arises in the aging organism, is considered one of the critical factors contributing to osteoporosis. Mitochondrial (mt)ROS, as the superoxide anion (O-2(-)) generated during mitochondrial respiration, are eliminated in the young organism by antioxidant defense mechanisms, including superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2), the expression and activity of which are decreased in aging mesenchymal progenitor cells, accompanied by increased mtROS production. Using a mouse model of osteoblast lineage cells with Sod2 deficiency, we observed significant bone loss in trabecular and cortical bones accompanied by decreased osteoblast activity, increased adipocyte accumulation in the bone marrow and augmented osteoclast activity, suggestive of altered mesenchymal progenitor cell differentiation and osteoclastogenesis. Furthermore, osteoblast senescence was increased. To date, there are only a few studies suggesting a causal association between mtROS and cellular senescence in tissue in vivo. Targeting SOD2 to improve redox homeostasis could represent a potential therapeutic strategy for maintaining bone health during aging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据