4.6 Article

Supplementary coprime array with enhanced DOFs exploiting hole filling strategy based on the difference and sum coarray

期刊

DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2021.103325

关键词

Degrees of freedom; Difference-sum coarray; DOA estimation; Hole filling; Mutual coupling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61801024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new coprime array configuration called supplementary coprime array (SCA) to address the limited number of degrees of freedom (DOFs) caused by the holes in the difference-sum coarray. The proposed SCA increases the number of DOFs significantly without introducing new sensors and reduces the mutual coupling effect. Numerical simulations are conducted to verify its effectiveness.
Recently, coprime array has attracted much attention for DOA estimation since it can provide high degrees of freedom (DOFs) by exploiting the difference and sum coarray (difference-sum coarray). However, the achievable number of uniform DOFs of coprime array is limited by the holes in the difference-sum coarray. In this paper, we propose a new coprime configuration named supplementary coprime array (SCA) to tackle the problem through the following three steps. We first analyze the structure of the difference-sum coarray and provide the closed-form expression of the hole positions. Then, we remove some unimportant sensors from the conventional coprime array to reduce the coarray redundancy, which brings a few new holes in the difference-sum coarray. Finally, we construct a supplementary subarray to fill the holes using the removed unimportant sensors. As a result, the proposed SCA can significantly increase the number of DOFs without introducing new sensors, and reduce the mutual coupling effect at the same time. Numerical simulations are provided to verify the effectiveness of the proposed array configuration. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据