4.4 Article

Feasibility and Safety of Endoscopic Ischemic Polypectomy and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome (with Video)

期刊

DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
卷 68, 期 1, 页码 252-258

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07477-w

关键词

Carcinoma; Endoscopic mucosal resection; Feasibility studies; Intussusception; Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long-term follow-up in patients with PJS showed that EIP is a feasible and safe technique, capable of treating a greater number of polyps per patient compared to EMR, without any complications, carcinoma, or intussusception in the small bowel.
Objectives Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) is a rare autosomal dominant hereditary disease with a clinical features related to gastrointestinal (GI) hamartomatous polyposis, frequently observed in the small bowel. Balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) has made non-surgical treatment of GI polyps possible. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has been performed but was associated with complications and difficulties. Recently, endoscopic ischemic polypectomy (EIP) has been developed and its usefulness reported. The study evaluated the feasibility and safety of EIP and the clinical outcomes of patients with PJS. Methods We retrospectively collected data of consecutive patients with PJS between September 2009 and March 2021. Data regarding clinical characteristics, follow-up methods, endoscopic management, and complications were collected. EIP feasibility and safety were assessed. Results Twenty-two patients were included. The observation period was 70 months (range, 5-153). Of the 124 therapeutic endoscopy procedures performed, 68 used BAE. Of the 607 polyps treated, 329 polyps were located in the small bowel. EIP was able to treat a greater number of polyps per patient than EMR (P < 0.003), without any complications, carcinoma, or intussusception in the small bowel (P < 0.001). During the follow-up period, 3 patients developed GI cancer. Conclusion Long-term follow-up in patients with PJS showed that EIP was a feasible and safe technique.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据