4.4 Article

Insulin secretion and action affect glucose variability in the early stages of glucose intolerance

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3531

关键词

glucose variability; insulin resistance; insulin sensitivity; prediabetes

资金

  1. European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to assess the relationship between insulin secretion and sensitivity, and daily glucose variability (GV) in the early stages of dysglycemia. The results showed that impairment of glucose tolerance was associated with worsening GV, and the increase in GV was inversely related to insulin secretion and action.
Aims Since it is unknown whether glucose variability (GV) is increased and whether this is related to worsening of insulin secretion and action in prediabetes, we have assessed insulin secretion and sensitivity, and daily GV in early stages of dysglycemia. Materials and Methods Twenty subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT; age 45.0 +/- 9.5 years; BMI 31.1 +/- 6.4 kg/m2), 25 with NGT and 1hrOGTT>8.6 mmol/L (1hrOGTT; 45.7 +/- 8.5 years; 32.4 +/- 7.0 kg/m2), and 59 with isolated impaired glucose tolerance (iIGT; 47.7 +/- 11.2 years; 31.3 +/- 6.1 kg/m2) underwent OGTT and MMTT. CGM was performed with blinded FreeStyle Libre Pro for 24 h under standard conditions. Parameters of beta-cell function, insulin sensitivity and GV were calculated. Results Overall insulin secretion and action as well as GV progressively worsened across glucose tolerance categories. On a matrix analysis, GV parameters were inversely related to ISSI-2; r = -0.37 to -0.52; p r = -0.28 to -0.48; p < 0.0001 for CV, SD, J-index, LI, HBGI and MAGE. Insulin secretion (IGI) and b-cell function (ISSI-2) emerged as independent contributors to GV in early stage of dysglycemia accounting for about 16%-38% of its variability. Conclusions Our results show that daily GV worsens already with mild impairment of glucose tolerance. The increase in GV is inversely related to insulin secretion and action.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据