4.5 Article

Associations of BMI with mortality in HFpEF patients with concomitant diabetes with insulin versus non-insulin treatment

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109805

关键词

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; Body mass index; Diabetes mellitus; Death

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that although obesity confers survival benefits in HFpEF patients, this effect disappears in patients with diabetes receiving insulin treatment. Insulin treatment may be a crucial confounder of the obesity paradox in HFpEF patients.
Background: Obesity confers paradoxical survival benefits in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of DM and insulin treatment status on the associations of body mass index (BMI) with the death risks in HFpEF patients. Methods: HFpEF patients from the TOPCAT trial were included. Cox regression model was constructed to assess the relationship of BMI with the risks of all-cause death and cardiovascular death. Restricted cubic splines were used to characterize the dose-response associations of BMI with risks of death. Results: Compared with normal weight, hazard ratios of all-cause death in overweight and class I obesity were 0.62 (0.45-0.85), 0.67 (0.47-0.94) in no DM HFpEF patients, and 0.48 (0.25-0.91), 0.41 (0.22-0.79) in noninsulin-treated DM patients. However, insulin treatment removed this beneficial effect. Consistent results were found when modeling for time-updated BMI. Cubic spline analyses suggested a linear trend of increased death risk with higher BMI in insulin-treated DM patients. Conclusions: The obesity paradox was present in HFpEF patients without DM or with non-insulin-treated DM but absent in those with insulin-treated DM. Insulin treatment may be a crucial confounder of the obesity paradox in HFpEF patients. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00094302.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据