4.7 Article

Rapid and efficient degradation of endogenous proteins in vivo identifies stage-specific roles of RNA Pol II pausing in mammalian development

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL CELL
卷 57, 期 8, 页码 1068-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.03.013

关键词

-

资金

  1. MSTP training grant from the NIH [T32GM007739, F30HD103398]
  2. NIH [R01NS092096, R37MH085726]
  3. NCI Cancer Center [P30CA008748-48]
  4. Weill Cornell Medicine Clinical & Translational Science Center Predoctoral Training Award [TL1TR002386]
  5. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Targeted protein degradation methods provide a unique approach to study protein function, but their effectiveness in vivo is still unclear. This study tested the functionality of the dTAG degron system in mammalian development and found that it is efficient and non-toxic, with a specific role in early embryo development and zygotic genome activation.
Targeted protein degradation methods offer a unique avenue to assess a protein's function in a variety of model systems. Recently, these approaches have been applied to mammalian cell culture models, enabling unprecedented temporal control of protein function. However, the efficacy of these systems at the tissue and organismal levels in vivo is not well established. Here, we tested the functionality of the degradation tag (dTAG) degron system in mammalian development. We generated a homozygous knock-in mouse with a FKBP12(F36V) tag fused to negative elongation factor b (Nelfb) locus, a ubiquitously expressed regulator of transcription. In our validation of targeted endogenous protein degradation across mammalian development and adulthood, we demonstrate that irrespective of the route of administration the dTAG system is non-toxic, rapid, and efficient in embryos from the zygote-to-mid-gestation stages. Additionally, acute depletion of NELFB revealed a specific role in zygote-to-2-cell development and zygotic genome activation (ZGA).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据