4.7 Article

Excess neuropeptides in lung signal through endothelial cells to impair gas exchange

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL CELL
卷 57, 期 7, 页码 839-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.02.023

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [OT2OD023857, R01HL146141]
  2. ATS Research Foundation [2019-1059]
  3. Orphan Disease Center [MDBR-21-115-NEHI]
  4. AHA pre-doctoral fellowship [828448]
  5. National Institutes of Health SIG [S10 OD026929]
  6. UCSD School of Medicine Micro-scopy Core (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke) [P30 NS047101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Excess neuropeptides derived from pulmonary neuroendocrine cells contribute to pulmonary manifestations including hypoxemia by affecting endothelial cell function, leading to lung fluid accumulation. Restricting neuropeptide function may improve fluid accumulation and gas exchange in these conditions.
Although increased neuropeptides are often detected in lungs that exhibit respiratory distress, whether they contribute to the condition is unknown. Here, we show in a mouse model of neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia of infancy, a pediatric disease with increased pulmonary neuroendocrine cells (PNECs), excess PNECderived neuropeptides are responsible for pulmonary manifestations including hypoxemia. In mouse postnatal lung, prolonged signaling from elevated neuropeptides such as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) activate receptors enriched on endothelial cells, leading to reduced cellular junction gene expression, increased endothelium permeability, excess lung fluid, and hypoxemia. Excess fluid and hypoxemia were effectively attenuated by either prevention of PNEC formation, inactivation of CGRP gene, endothelium-specific inactivation of CGRP receptor gene, or treatment with CGRP receptor antagonist. Neuropeptides were increased in human lung diseases with excess fluid such as acute respiratory distress syndrome. Our findings suggest that restricting neuropeptide function may limit fluid and improve gas exchange in these conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据