4.7 Article

Single-cell analysis of human testis aging and correlation with elevated body mass index

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL CELL
卷 57, 期 9, 页码 1160-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.04.004

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIA [R01AG069725]
  2. NCI [P30CA042014]
  3. Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation [TJ2020-0023]
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [245169951, 427588170]
  5. DFG [MA1080/27-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilized single-cell RNA-seq to investigate the effects of aging on testicular cells in men. The results revealed age-related changes in multiple cell types, including alterations in signaling pathways, inflammation, and metabolism. The extent of dysregulation was also found to be correlated with body mass index in older men. This research provides insights into the candidate molecular mechanisms underlying testicular changes caused by aging.
Aging men display reduced reproductive health; however, testis aging is poorly understood at the molecular and genomic levels. Here, we utilized single-cell RNA-seq to profile over 44,000 cells from both young and older men and examined age-related changes in germline development and in the testicular somatic cells. Age-related changes in spermatogonial stem cells appeared modest, whereas age-related dysregulation of spermatogenesis and somatic cells ranged from moderate to severe. Altered pathways included signaling and inflammation in multiple cell types, metabolic signaling in Sertoli cells, hedgehog signaling and testosterone production in Leydig cells, cell death and growth in testicular peritubular cells, and possible developmental regression in both Leydig and peritubular cells. Remarkably, the extent of dysregulation correlated with body mass index in older but not in younger men. Collectively, we reveal candidate molecular mechanisms underlying the complex testicular changes conferred by aging and their possible exacerbation by concurrent chronic conditions such as obesity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据