4.7 Article

Notch-dependent DNA cis-regulatory elements and their dose-dependent control of C. elegans stem cell self-renewal

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 149, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.200332

关键词

Gradient; Homotypic cluster; smFISH; Spatiotemporal resolution; sygl-1; Transcription factor binding site

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE-1747503]
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides important insights into how DNA cis-regulatory elements impact stem cell regulation and gene expression by mutating these elements in the nematode C. elegans.
A long-standing biological question is how DNA cis-regulatory elements shape transcriptional patterns during metazoan development. Reporter constructs, cell culture assays and computational modeling have made major contributions to answering this question, but analysis of elements in their natural context is an important complement. Here, we mutate Notch-dependent LAG-1 binding sites (LBSs) in the endogenous Caenorhabditis elegans sygl-1 gene, which encodes a key stem cell regulator, and analyze the consequences on sygl-1 expression (nascent transcripts, mRNA, protein) and stem cell maintenance. Mutation of one LBS in a three-element cluster approximately halved both expression and stem cell pool size, whereas mutation of two LBSs essentially abolished them. Heterozygous LBS mutant clusters provided intermediate values. Our results lead to two major conclusions. First, both LBS number and configuration impact cluster activity: LBSs act additively in trans and synergistically in cis. Second, the SYGL-1 gradient promotes self-renewal above its functional threshold and triggers differentiation below the threshold. Our approach of coupling CRISPR/Cas9 LBS mutations with effects on both molecular and biological readouts establishes a powerful model for in vivo analyses of DNA cis-regulatory elements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据