4.4 Article

Target Diseases for Neonatal Screening in Germany Challenges for Treatment and Long-Term Care

期刊

DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL
卷 119, 期 17, 页码 306-316

出版社

DEUTSCHER AERZTE-VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0075

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neonatal screening in Germany detects metabolic diseases early, allowing for better development and a normal life. Approximately one in five newborns have positive screening findings, making prompt evaluation and treatment essential.
Background: Neonatal screening in Germany currently comprises 19 congenital diseases, 13 of which are metabolic diseases. Approximately one in 1300 newborns suffers from one of these target diseases. Early diagnosis and treatment enable the affected children to undergo better development and even, in many cases, to have a normal life. Methods: This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed and Embase databases. Results: Positive screening findings are confirmed in approximately one out of five newborns. The prompt evaluation of suspected diagnoses is essential, as treatment for some of these diseases must be initiated immediately after birth to prevent long-term sequelae. The most commonly identified diseases are primary hypothyroidism (1:3338). phenylketonuria/hyperphenylalaninemia (1 : 5262). cystic fibrosis (1 : 5400). and medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (1 : 10 086). Patient numbers are rising as new variants of the target diseases are being identified, and treatments must be adapted to their heterogeneous manifestations. Precise diagnosis and the planning of treatment, which is generally lifelong, are best carried out in a specialized center. Conclusion: Improved diagnosis and treatment now prolong the lives of many patients with congenital diseases. The provision of appropriate long-term treatment extending into adulthood will be a central structural task for screening medicine in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据