4.1 Review

Natural bioactive compounds of honey and their antimicrobial activity

期刊

CZECH JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCES
卷 40, 期 3, 页码 163-178

出版社

CZECH ACADEMY AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.17221/247/2021-CJFS

关键词

bioactive components; antibacterial activity; honey; floral source; biological activities

资金

  1. General Direction for Scientific Research and Technological Development-Algiers (DGRSDT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This literature review outlines the natural antimicrobial potential of honey, including its antibacterial, antifungal, antimycotic, protozoal, and antiviral properties. It also explains the factors and mechanisms behind this potential, such as osmotic pressure, acid content, and bioactive compounds.
Honey is a complex and variable mixture that contains more than 180 biochemical compounds from various molecule families. This mixture is obtained after processing the nectar out of plant food sources at the level of the bee abdomen. The bioactive components found in this natural product are in charge of its antimicrobial properties. Honey is used for its antibacterial actions against Gram-positive (Gram+) and Gram-negative (Gram-) bacteria, its anti-fungal and antimycotic actions against moulds and yeasts, along with its protozoal and antiviral activities. This literature review outlines the natural antimicrobial potential of honey; it explains the factors responsible for this potential and spells out their mechanisms of action. Osmotic pressure, water activity, the acid content of honey, presence of bioactive compounds like hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), phenolic acids, flavonoids, methylglyoxal (MGO), defensin-1, lysozyme, volatile compounds as well as antibacterial products secreted from the lactic bacteria that are behind this antimicrobial activity. This potential basically depends on the biological activities of the initially harvested floral source, its geographical origin, season, storage conditions, honey age, health of bee colonies and suitable beekeeping practices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据