4.3 Review

Nucleotide-Binding Oligomerization Domain-Containing Protein 1 Regulates Inflammatory Response in Endometriosis

期刊

CURRENT PROTEIN & PEPTIDE SCIENCE
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 121-128

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1389203723666220322125031

关键词

Endometriosis; endometrial stromal cells; inflammation; NOD1; ML130; tumor necrosis factor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study found that NOD1 is related to the inflammatory response in endometriosis. The levels of NOD1 were elevated and positively correlated with inflammatory cytokines in ectopic endometrium. Inhibition of NOD1 reduced cell viability and the production of inflammatory cytokines.
Background: Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 1 (NOD1) is known to play an important role in innate immunity, while the relationship between NOD1 and inflammatory response in endometriosis remains unknown. The present study aims to investigate the effects of NOD1 on inflammatory response in endometriosis. Methods: Immunohistochemistry staining, Western blot, and qRT-PCR were conducted to investigate the levels of NOD1 and inflammatory cytokines in the endometriotic lesions. A Spearman's rank correlation analysis was conducted to determine the correlations of NOD1 and inflammatory cytokines (interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1). Human endometrial stromal cells (HESCs) were isolated and incubated with peritoneal fluid with or without ML130. Cell viability was determined by using an MTT assay. Results: A significant elevation in NOD1 and inflammatory cytokine was observed in ectopic endometrium. Interestingly, a positive correlation between NOD1 and inflammatory cytokines was observed. In addition, treatment with ML130 significantly suppressed cell viability and the production of inflammatory cytokines in the 20% peritoneal fluid treated ectopic HESCs. Conclusions: NOD1 is related to the inflammatory response that is involved in endometriosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据