4.7 Review

Improving antibody drug development using bionanotechnology

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 74, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.10.027

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [RF1AG059723, R35GM136300, 1T32GM140223-01, F32GM137513]
  2. National Science Foundation [CBET 1813963, 1605266, 1804313]
  3. Albert M. Mattocks Chair
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1804313] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1804313] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monoclonal antibodies are widely used in the treatment of various human disorders. However, there are challenges in the early stages of antibody drug development, particularly in generating antibodies against membrane proteins and identifying antibodies with drug-like biophysical properties. This article highlights bionanotechnologies for preparing functional membrane proteins and screening antibody biophysical properties, which can improve antibody discovery and engineering efforts.
Monoclonal antibodies are being used to treat a remarkable breadth of human disorders. Nevertheless, there are several key challenges at the earliest stages of antibody drug development that need to be addressed using simple and widely accessible methods, especially related to generating antibodies against membrane proteins and identifying antibody candidates with drug-like biophysical properties (high solubility and low viscosity). Here we highlight key bionanotechnologies for preparing functional and stable membrane proteins in diverse types of lipoparticles that are being used to improve antibody discovery and engineering efforts. We also highlight key bionanotechnologies for high-throughput and ultra-dilute screening of antibody biophysical properties during antibody discovery and optimization that are being used for identifying antibodies with superior combinations of in vitro (formulation) and in vivo (half-life) properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据