4.7 Review

Complexity of subcellular metabolism: strategies for compartment-specific profiling

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102711

关键词

-

资金

  1. Volkswagen Foundation, Germany [11-76251-19-4/19 (ZN3429)]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) , Germany [HI1400/3-1]
  3. DFG-sonderforschungsbereiche (SFB) , Germany [SFB-1454 (432325352)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subcellular compartmentalization provides cells with advantages in cellular metabolism by generating microenvironments with distinct concentrations of metabolites and allowing the execution of thermodynamically exclusive reactions simultaneously. However, the limited availability of reliable methods for inspecting subcellular metabolic activities has been a major obstacle. Recent advances in subcellular metabolomics have made significant progress in the assessment of compartment-specific metabolism.
Subcellular compartmentalization provides cells with tremendous advantages for the operation of cellular metabolism. Spatial separation of metabolism generates microenvironments with distinct concentrations of metabolites and cofactors allowing the cell to execute otherwise thermodynamically exclusive reactions simultaneously. Moreover, compartmentalization is also involved in the finetuned regulation of gene expression. Thus, the elucidation of compartment-specific metabolic processes has become essential for a thorough understanding of cellular metabolism. The limited availability of reliable methods to inspect metabolic activities in subcellular compartments has been a major impediment in this field. During the last decade, progress has been greatly extended through methodological advances in subcellular metabolic profiling. This review summarizes recent strategies applied for the direct and indirect assessment of compartment-specific metabolism. We review contemporary techniques, recent advances, limitations, and future trends in the field of subcellular metabolomics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据