4.7 Review

Enabling technologies towards personalization of scaffolds for large bone defect regeneration

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 74, 期 -, 页码 263-270

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.12.002

关键词

-

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany (Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung, BMBF) [01ZX1910]
  2. German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG) [435204959]
  3. Klaus Tschira Boost Fund - German Scholars Organization [KT05]
  4. German Research Foundation (DFG) [427826188]
  5. European Union [953169]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Additive manufacturing can produce personalized scaffolds for large volume defect tissue regeneration, but faces challenges due to the heterogeneous biological regeneration potential across individuals. By combining technologies such as in silico modeling, omics, bioinformatics, and information technology, personalized tissue regeneration strategies can be developed using additive manufacturing, which has great potential in advancing precision medicine.
Additive manufacturing (AM) can deliver personalized scaffolds to support large volume defect tissue regeneration - a major clinical challenge in many medical disciplines. The freedom in scaffold design and composition (biomaterials and biologics) offered by AM yields a plethora of possibilities but is confronted with a heterogenous biological regeneration potential across individuals. A key challenge is to make the right choice for individualized scaffolds that match biology, anatomy, and mechanics of patients. This review provides an overview of state-of-the-art technologies, that is, in silico modelling for scaffold design, omics and bioinformatics to capture patient biology and information technology for data management, that, when combined in a synergistic way with AM, have great potential to make personalized tissue regeneration strategies available to all patients, empowering precision medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据