4.2 Review

How adaptive laboratory evolution can boost yeast tolerance to lignocellulosic hydrolyses

期刊

CURRENT GENETICS
卷 68, 期 3-4, 页码 319-342

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00294-022-01237-z

关键词

Adaptive laboratory evolution; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Lignocellulosic hydrolysates; Molecular genetics; Second-generation ethanol

资金

  1. [FAPESP 2017/24453-5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a promising candidate for converting lignocellulosic biomass into chemicals and fuels. To increase the yeast tolerance to fermentation inhibitors resulting from biomass pretreatment, adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) experiments can be used to identify and test adaptive alleles through whole-genome sequencing and reverse engineering. This knowledge can be used to engineer superior yeast strains for biomass-based bioprocesses.
The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an excellent candidate for establishing cell factories to convert lignocellulosic biomass into chemicals and fuels. To enable this technology, yeast robustness must be improved to withstand the fermentation inhibitors (e.g., weak organic acids, phenols, and furan aldehydes) resulting from biomass pretreatment and hydrolysis. Here, we discuss how evolution experiments performed in the lab, a method commonly known as adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE), may contribute to lifting yeast tolerance against the inhibitors of lignocellulosic hydrolysates (LCHs). The key is that, through the combination of whole-genome sequencing and reverse engineering, ALE provides a robust platform for discovering and testing adaptive alleles, allowing to explore the genetic underpinnings of yeast responses to LCHs. We review the insights gained from past evolution experiments with S. cerevisiae in LCH inhibitors and propose experimental designs to optimise the discovery of genetic variants adaptive to biomass toxicity. The knowledge gathered through ALE projects is envisaged as a roadmap to engineer superior yeast strains for biomass-based bioprocesses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据