4.8 Article

Tiling mechanisms of the Drosophila compound eye through geometrical tessellation

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 9, 页码 2101-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.03.046

关键词

-

资金

  1. CREST from JST [JPMJCR14D3]
  2. MEXT [18K06251, 18K13452, 15H05857, 19K03611, 20H05948, 17H03542, 17H05739, 17H05761, 19H04771]
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  5. Cooperative Research of Network Joint Research Center for Materials and Devices''
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20H05948, 19H04771, 19K03611, 18K06251, 17H05761, 15H05857, 17H05739, 18K13452, 17H03542] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tiling patterns, such as hexagons and squares, are observed in biological structures like compound eyes. While hexagonal tiling is commonly seen due to mechanical restrictions, some insects and crustaceans display tetragonal tiling. The regular distribution and uniform growth of ommatidia play a crucial role in determining the tiling patterns in compound eyes, as demonstrated in small-eye mutants and mantis shrimps.
Tiling patterns are observed in many biological structures. The compound eye is an interesting example of tiling and is often constructed by hexagonal arrays of ommatidia, the optical unit of the compound eye. Hexagonal tiling may be common due to mechanical restrictions such as structural robustness, minimal boundary length, and space-filling efficiency. However, some insects exhibit tetragonal facets.(1-4) Some aquatic crustaceans, such as shrimp and lobsters, have evolved with tetragonal facets.(5-8) Mantis shrimp is an insightful example as its compound eye has a tetragonal midband region sandwiched between hexagonal hemispheres.(9,10 )This casts doubt on the naive explanation that hexagonal tiles recur in nature because of their mechanical stability. Similarly, tetragonal tiling patterns are also observed in some Drosophila smal-leye mutants, whereas the wild-type eyes are hexagonal, suggesting that the ommatidial tiling is not simply explained by such mechanical restrictions. If so, how are the hexagonal and tetragonal patterns controlled during development? Here, we demonstrate that geometrical tessellation determines the ommatidial tiling patterns. In small-eye mutants, the hexagonal pattern is transformed into a tetragonal pattern as the relative positions of neighboring ommatidia are stretched along the dorsal-ventral axis. We propose that the regular distribution of ommatidia and their uniform growth collectively play an essential role in the establishment of tetragonal and hexagonal tiling patterns in compound eyes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据