4.5 Article

Assessing phenotypic diversity in silflower (Silphium integrifolium Michx.) to identify traits of interest for domestication selection

期刊

CROP SCIENCE
卷 62, 期 4, 页码 1443-1460

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/csc2.20748

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Perennial Agriculture Project
  2. Land Institute
  3. Malone Family Land Preservation Fund
  4. United States Department of Agriculture's National Institute of Food and Agriculture Grant [2019-67011-29607]
  5. Minnesota Department of Agriculture-Forever Green Agricultural Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a multilocation trial of silflower genotypes and identified heritable traits and patterns of correlation across years and environments. The study also found several important traits contributing to yield and lodging levels. These findings will guide future silflower domestication efforts and breeding programs.
Silflower (Silphium integrifolium Michx.) has been identified as a candidate for domestication as a perennial oilseed crop. In order to successfully domesticate silflower it will be necessary to identify traits that should be targeted for selection. We have conducted the first multilocation trial of replicated silflower genotypes at six sites across four states. By observing architectural, phenological, and yield traits in a diversity panel of silflower breeding material, we were able to estimate the heritability of these traits, as well as patterns of correlation across years and environments. We found that this population expressed heritable variation for many, but not all, traits of interest, and that targeted introgression of diversity may be beneficial for some traits. In addition, we used regression analysis to identify several traits, particularly height, number of stalks per plant, and stalk diameter as important contributors to determining levels of yield and levels of lodging. These results will help to guide future silflower domestication efforts and have already shaped the direction of our breeding program.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据