4.6 Review

Probiotics: insights and new opportunities for Clostridioides difficile intervention

期刊

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 49, 期 3, 页码 414-434

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1040841X.2022.2072705

关键词

Probiotics; C; difficile; inhibition; virulence; immunomodulatory; genomic exploration; discovery informatics; metabolomics; multi-omics; regulatory requirements

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review discusses the potential of probiotics in preventing and treating Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and its recurrence, reevaluates the efficacy of probiotic supplementation as an intervention for CDI, explores lessons learned from probiotic modulation of the immune system, and delves into avenues such as genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions and genome sequencing to identify novel strains and understand their functionality. The current regulatory framework, challenges, and future directions are also discussed.
Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a life-threatening disease caused by the Gram-positive, opportunistic intestinal pathogen C. difficile. Despite the availability of antimicrobial drugs to treat CDI, such as vancomycin, metronidazole, and fidaxomicin, recurrence of infection remains a significant clinical challenge. The use of live commensal microorganisms, or probiotics, is one of the most investigated non-antibiotic therapeutic options to balance gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota and subsequently tackle dysbiosis. In this review, we will discuss major commensal probiotic strains that have the potential to prevent and/or treat CDI and its recurrence, reassess the efficacy of probiotics supplementation as a CDI intervention, delve into lessons learned from probiotic modulation of the immune system, explore avenues like genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions, genome sequencing, and multi-omics to identify novel strains and understand their functionality, and discuss the current regulatory framework, challenges, and future directions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据