4.5 Article

Constraining the isotopic endmembers contributing to 1.1 Ga Keweenawan large igneous province magmatism

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00410-022-01907-8

关键词

Intra-plate processes; Mantle processes; Mid-continent rift; Keweenawan large igneous province; Hf isotopes; Continental lithospheric mantle

资金

  1. United States National Science Foundation [EAR1549764, EAR-1549676, EAR-1549920]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the role of the continental lithospheric mantle in continental flood basalts erupted in the 1.1 billion-year-old Keweenawan large igneous province in North America. It reveals that the Mamainse Point lavas are likely to be partially contaminated melts of the Keweenawan plume and ambient upper mantle, with no clear evidence of contributions from an enriched lithospheric mantle.
Continental flood basalt lavas often contain deeply-sourced, thermo-chemically anomalous material that can provide a potential probe of inaccessible reservoirs. However, continental flood basalts interact with geochemically diverse domains within the continental lithosphere, which may complicate interpretations of deep mantle signatures. We examine the role of continental lithospheric mantle in continental flood basalts erupted as part of the 1.1 Ga Keweenawan large igneous province, centered on the Lake Superior region of North America. We show that flood basalts at Mamainse Point exhibit a range of epsilon(Hf 1100) from -14.1 to +6, plotting along the global epsilon(Hf-)epsilon(Nd) mantle array. Lithospheric mantle melts represented by alkaline rocks from the Coldwell and Seabrook Lake Complexes yield positive epsilon(Nd 1100) (+0.7 to +4.3) and epsilon(Hf 1100) from -6.9 to +2.4, placing them below the mantle array. Mamainse Point lavas are interpreted to be variably crustally contaminated melts of the Keweenawan plume and ambient upper mantle; there is no clear evidence for contributions from an enriched lithospheric mantle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据