4.7 Article

Investigation on mechanical behaviors of a new sustainable composite material for fiber-reinforced recycled aggregate concrete under compressive low-cycle loadings

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 326, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126916

关键词

fiber-reinforced recycled aggregate concrete; (FRAC); Peak stress; Peak strain; Ultimate strain; Optimum volume fraction; fiber influence factor (FIF)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51608383, 52078358]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Founda-tion [2014M550247, 2015T80449]
  3. Key Projects of Science & Technology Pillar Program of Henan Province [152102310027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) has gained global attention for its ecological and economic significance. This study mixed steel fiber and polypropylene fiber into RAC to improve its mechanical properties and proposed an optimum design method for fiber content in fiber-reinforced recycled aggregate concrete (FRAC).
Recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) has been attracting worldwide research and development interests due to its ecological and economic significance. In this investigation, the steel fiber (SF) and polypropylene fiber (PPF) were mixed into the recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) to improve the mechanical properties. Based on the cyclic compressive loading tests, the variation of the strength and deformation of fiber-reinforced recycled aggregate concrete (FRAC) was explored, and the optimum design method of fiber content for FRAC was proposed. The calculation models for fiber influence factors (FIFs) of the peak stress, peak strain, ultimate strain, and the post peak modulus were put forward, respectively. The optimum volume fractions of SF and PPF for RAC were recommended, which are 1.7% and 2.27%, respectively. This study provides technical support and a theoretical basis for the promotion of recycled aggregate concrete material and structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据