4.7 Article

Study on evaluation of elastic modulus of crumb rubber concrete in meso-scale

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 331, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127247

关键词

Elastic modulus; Mesoscale; Crumb rubber concrete; Improved Mori-Tanaka model; Interface transition zone (ITZ)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foun-dation of China [51978590, 52178254]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an improved Mori-Tanaka model (IMT) was proposed to estimate the elastic modulus of crumb rubber concrete (CRC). The IMT model showed more accurate prediction of the elastic modulus of CRC and assessed the importance of different factors influencing its elastic modulus.
Crumb rubber concrete (CRC) has attracted significant attention as a typical reclamation and recycling of solid wastes, and endows concrete with excellent impact resistance. However, the elastic modulus of CRC can be affected by the uncertain properties of rubber crumbs. In this study, an improved Mori-Tanaka model (IMT) was proposed to estimate the elastic modulus of CRC in meso-scale. The model establishes the quantitative relationship between the elastic modulus and volume fraction of all constituent materials (ordinary aggregate, rubber crumbs, and cementitious materials) involved in CRC and its interface transition zone (ITZ). The results indicate that the error of IMT predicted elastic modulus of CRC is about 3.9%, which is reduced by about 8.9% compared with the Mori-Tanaka model (MT model). Further, the importance of different factors influencing the elastic modulus of CRC is assessed by the IMT model. The specific attributes of rubber crumbs (particle size and volume fraction), ITZ, and cementitious materials (the elastic modulus) have been shown to affect the elastic modulus of CRC significantly. Thus, the IMT model can be beneficial for the design of CRC with specific elastic modulus by considering the effect of different constituents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据