4.7 Article

Combination of acoustic emission and digital image correlation monitoring for wedge splitting tests on large concrete specimens

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 322, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126496

关键词

Digital image correlation; Acoustic emission; Large mass concrete specimen; Wedge splitting test; Local fracture energy; Boundary effect; Fracture process zone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, acoustic emission and digital image correlation techniques were combined to monitor wedge splitting tests on large concrete specimens. The results showed that the cumulative acoustic energy recorded closely correlated to the cumulative fracture energy, specifically related to microcracking in the local fracture process zone. A new post-processing methodology for digital image correlation was also introduced to assess the evolution of local fracture energy and the length of the fracture process zone during the test. The boundary effects were found to only affect the length of the fracture process zone, contrary to the expectation that it would affect the evolution of local fracture energy.
Acoustic emission (AE) and digital image correlation (DIC) techniques are combined to monitor wedge splitting tests performed on very large concrete specimens made of mass concrete mixture with 100 mm maximum aggregate size. It is shown that cumulative acoustic energy recorded by AE is closely correlated to cumulative fracture energy when only the acoustic events related to microcracking in the local fracture process zone (FPZ) are considered. A new post-processing methodology is presented for DIC, and allows to assess the evolution of the local fracture energy and the length of FPZ during the wedge splitting test. Application of this methodology on WS test results allowed to visualize the boundary effects only on the length of FPZ. Contrary to what was expected, the local fracture energy evolution does not seem to be affected by boundary effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据