4.7 Article

A combined numerical-experimental approach to analyzing fracture initiation and development in brittle rocks

期刊

COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104663

关键词

Dis-continuum; Crack; Cohesive model; Damage-Plasticity; Rock fracture; Digital Image Correlation (DIC)

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [LP150100539, LP200100038]
  2. OZ Minerals Ltd [FT140100408, FT200100884, DP170103793]
  3. Australian Research Council [LP200100038, LP150100539] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a combined numerical-experimental approach to investigate crack initiation and development in brittle rocks. The proposed approach demonstrates the potential for capturing rock responses at both scales through numerical simulation and experimental validation.
This paper presents a combined numerical-experimental approach to investigating crack initiation and development in brittle rocks. A three-dimensional dis-continuum based numerical modeling technique is used where rock specimens are idealized as an assembly of deformable tetrahedral blocks interacting via cohesive-frictional contacts. A new cohesive-frictional contact model is developed and implemented in the software 3DEC by Itasca to capture realistic material behavior at grain scale under different loading conditions. The proposed cohesive frictional contact model model is based on a unified damage-friction criterion that evolves with damage towards a frictional behavior, with effects of damage on dilation behavior to capture evolving contact conditions between rough surfaces. In conjunction with the numerical development are laboratory experiments using Digital Image Correlation (DIC) technique to provide experimental data to validate numerical simulation results at both specimen and local scales. The potentials of the proposed approach in capturing rock responses at both scales are demonstrated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据