4.7 Article

Modeling of three-dimensional single rough rock fissures: A study on flow rate and fractal parameters using the Weierstrass-Mandelbrot function

期刊

COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104655

关键词

Rock fissure; Fluid flow; Fractal dimension; Roughness; Weierstrass-Mandelbrot function; 3D printing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52079092]
  2. Joint Fund of Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. Yalong River Hydro-power Development Co., Ltd. [U1765106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study employs the Weierstrass-Mandelbrot (W-M) function to model the irregular fissure surfaces and investigates their effects on fluid flow. The paper finds a strong correlation between flow rate and fractal parameters, and proposes modified cubic law equations. The study also discusses the similarity of W-M surfaces and real fissure surfaces.
The irregular asperities of rock fissures crucially affect the fluid flow through rock masses. In this paper, the Weierstrass-Mandelbrot (W-M) function was employed to model the irregular fissure surfaces. Based on the above fissure model, we numerically analyzed the effects of the fractal parameters on fluid flow by solving the Reynolds equation with the local Cubic Law approach. The classical Cubic Law was then modified in regard to two fitted correction functions of D and G, which indicated the actual fracture aperture and the actual hydraulic gradient of W-M surfaces and were both found to be S-shaped. The outcomes reveal a high correlation between the flow rate and the fractal parameters. Then, the similarity of W-M surfaces to real fissure surfaces was discussed in terms of absolute roughness, ensure the modified cubic law is applicable to real rock fractures. To verify the accuracy of correction functions, dynamic water grouting test device based on single fracture were innovatively developed and the corresponding injection tests were carried out.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据