4.7 Article

Hybrid order picking: A simulation model of a joint manual and autonomous order picking system

期刊

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
卷 167, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.107981

关键词

Warehousing; Collaborative order picking; Autonomous picking robot; Picker blocking; Agent-based simulation

资金

  1. European Union [873077]
  2. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [873077] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Order picking is a critical process that affects business success in various industries. While manual operations are still common, there are also technologies available to automate or support order picking. This study examines hybrid order picking, where autonomous robots and human pickers work together, and evaluates its performance using a simulation model. The results show that hybrid order picking can improve throughput and reduce costs compared to pure manual or automated order picking. Future research potentials are discussed based on the simulation results.
Order picking is a key process in supply chains and a determinant of business success in many industries. Order picking is still performed manually by human operators in most companies; however, there are also increasingly more technologies available to automate order picking processes or to support human order pickers.One concept that has not attracted much research attention so far is hybrid order picking where autonomous robots and human order pickers work together in warehouses within a shared workspace for a joint target. This study presents a simulation model that considers various system characteristics and parameters of hybrid order picking systems, such as picker blocking, to evaluate the performance of such systems. Our results show that hybrid order picking is generally capable of improving pure manual or automated order picking operations in terms of throughput and total costs. Based on the simulation results, promising future research potentials are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据