4.7 Article

The enriched median routing problem and its usefulness in practice

期刊

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108063

关键词

Location; Routing; Emergency logistics; Combined planning; Simulation study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the authors optimize the tasks of emergency response fleets by proposing the Median Routing Problem (MRP) and the Enriched Median Routing Problem (E-MRP). By comparing the performance of the proposed E-MRP solutions with the current operational practice, the study demonstrates the effectiveness of the E-MRP solution in reducing emergency response times.
Emergency response fleets often have to simultaneously perform two types of tasks: (1) urgent tasks requiring immediate action, and (2) non-urgent preventive maintenance tasks that can be scheduled upfront. In Huizing et al. (2020), Huizing et al. proposed the Median Routing Problem (MRP) to optimally schedule agents to a given set of non-urgent tasks, such that the response time for urgent tasks remains minimal. They proposed both an exact MILP-solution and a fast, scalable and accurate heuristic. However, when implementing the MRP-solution in a real-life pilot with a Dutch railway provider, we found that the model needed to be extended by including additional practical objectives and constraints. Therefore, in this paper, we extend the MRP to the so-called Enriched Median Routing Problem (E-MRP), making the model much better aligned with considerations from practice. Accordingly, we extend the MRP-based solutions to the E-MRP. This allows us to compare the performance of our proposed E-MRP solutions to performance obtained in the current operational practice of our partnering railway infrastructure company. We conclude that the E-MRP solution leads to a strong reduction in emergency response times compared to current practice by smartly scheduling the same volumes of non-urgent tasks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据