4.7 Article

Core box image recognition and its improvement with a new augmentation technique

期刊

COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES
卷 162, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105099

关键词

Core box image; Segmentation; Convolutional neural networks; Geology; Template-like augmentation; Core column extraction; Machine vision

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An innovative method and algorithm for extracting core columns from core boxes is proposed in this study to improve the efficiency of automated full-bore rock core image analysis. By simulating different environments and using template-like augmentation technology, the accuracy and effectiveness of machine learning algorithms are enhanced. This method can significantly accelerate core box processing.
Most methods for automated full-bore rock core image analysis (description, colour, properties distribution, etc.) are based on separate core column analyses. The core is usually imaged in a box because of the significant amount of time taken to get an image for each core column. The work presents an innovative method and algorithm for core columns extraction from core boxes. The conditions for core boxes' imaging may differ tremendously. Such differences are disastrous for machine learning algorithms which need a large dataset describing all possible data variations. Still, such images have some standard features - a box and core. Thus, we can emulate different environments with a unique augmentation described in this work. It is called template-like augmentation (TLA). The method is described and tested on various environments, and results are compared on an algorithm trained on both traditional data and a mix of traditional and TLA data. The algorithm trained with TLA data provides better metrics and can detect core on most new images, unlike the algorithm trained on data without TLA. The algorithm for core column extraction implemented in an automated core description system speeds up the core box processing by a factor of 20.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据