4.5 Article

Application of finite volume particle method for axisymmetric modeling of droplet formation in dripping and Rayleigh regimes

期刊

COMPUTERS & FLUIDS
卷 236, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2022.105321

关键词

Finite volume particle method; Meshless; Axisymmetric; Capillary instability; Dripping; Jet breakup

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)
  2. Aerogen Limited
  3. European Regional Development Fund [13/RC/2073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An axisymmetric model has been developed in the finite volume particle method (FVPM) to study the behaviors of liquid droplets, capillary dripping, and jet disintegration. The simulations show good agreement with experimental and theoretical results, validating the accuracy of the model.
An axisymmetric model has been developed in the finite volume particle method (FVPM). FVPM is a conservative, consistent, meshless particle method that incorporates properties of both smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) and the mesh-based finite volume method (FVM). The surface tension effect amplifies capillary instability which is the main mechanism in dripping and jet disintegration. The simulations are performed in 2D cylindrical coordinates by only considering the liquid flow (one phase). The model is validated for free liquid droplet evolved from cylindrical state, dripping from a capillary tube, Rayleigh instability of capillary liquid cylinder columns, and Rayleigh breakup of viscous jets. The FVPM-predicted pressure and oscillating period are in good agreement with theoretical solution for a free droplet. The FVPM-computed dripping length shows good consistency with provided experimental data in literature. The predicted growth rate of capillary instability is in good agreement with analytical solutions for flows with different orders of Ohnesorge numbers. The numerical breakup length of jet with Weber numbers between 2.5 and 40 has been determined with good accuracy based on analytical experimental solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据