4.5 Article

Stacking approach for accurate Invasive Ductal Carcinoma classification

期刊

COMPUTERS & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.107937

关键词

Deep learning; Breast cancer; Clinical image data; Transfer learning; Data augmentation; Stacking; Classification; Accuracy; Diagnosis; Analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61370073]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2007AA01Z423]
  3. project of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province [H04010601W00614016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate diagnosis of breast cancer requires leveraging artificial intelligence-based methods. Researchers propose a deep learning-based stacking method (StackBC) that combines different deep learning models, transfer learning, and data augmentation to balance the dataset and train the model. The use of stacking technique further improves predictive outputs, outperforming state-of-the-art methods in breast cancer diagnosis.
The accurate diagnosis of Breast cancer (BC) requires adequately exploiting Artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods in the diagnosing process. To tackle the issue of accurate BC diagnosis, we have proposed a deep learning-based stacking method (StackBC). In particular, we have incorporated deep learning models including Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short Term Memory (LSTM), and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) for the classification of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC). Additionally, Transfer Learning (TL) and Data Augmentation (DA) approaches have been incorporated to balance the dataset and adequately train the model. To further improve the predictive outputs of the model, we used the stacking technique. Among the three individual base classifiers, the performance of the GRU model was better. Hence, we selected the GRU as a meta classifier to distinguish between Non-IDC and IDC breast images. The experimental results confirmed that the StackBC method outperformed state-of-the-art methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据