4.6 Article

Integration of fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency and fuzzy decision by opinion score methods under a q-rung orthopair environment: A distribution case study of COVID-19 vaccine doses

期刊

COMPUTER STANDARDS & INTERFACES
卷 80, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csi.2021.103572

关键词

COVID-19; Vaccine; Multicriteria decision-making; q-Rung orthopair fuzzy; FWZIC; FDOSM

资金

  1. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia [2020-0296-109-11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to limitations of Pythagorean fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy sets, a new fuzzy set called q-rung orthopair fuzzy set (q-ROFS) has been developed to address restrictions in multicriteria decision making (MCDM). This study extended two MCDM methods under q-ROFS, resulting in q-rung orthopair fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency (q-ROFWZIC) and q-rung orthopair fuzzy decision by opinion score method (q-ROFDOSM). The methodology involved two phases and was tested on a COVID-19 vaccine distribution case study, showing systematic ranking and sensitivity analysis results.
Owing to the limitations of Pythagorean fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy sets, scientists have developed a distinct and successive fuzzy set called the q-rung orthopair fuzzy set (q-ROFS), which eliminates restrictions encountered by decision-makers in multicriteria decision making (MCDM) methods and facilitates the representation of complex uncertain information in real-world circumstances. Given its advantages and flexibility, this study has extended two considerable MCDM methods the fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency (FWZIC) method and fuzzy decision by opinion score method (FDOSM) under the fuzzy environment of q-ROFS. The extensions were called q-rung orthopair fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency (q-ROFWZIC) method and q-rung orthopair fuzzy decision by opinion score method (q-ROFDOSM). The methodology formulated had two phases. The first phase 'development' presented the sequential steps of each method thoroughly.The q-ROFWZIC method was formulated and used in determining the weights of evaluation criteria and then integrated into the q-ROFDOSM for the prioritisation of alternatives on the basis of the weighted criteria. In the second phase, a case study regarding the MCDM problem of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine distribution was performed. The purpose was to provide fair allocation of COVID-19 vaccine doses. A decision matrix based on an intersection of 'recipients list' and 'COVID-19 distribution criteria' was adopted. The proposed methods were evaluated according to systematic ranking assessment and sensitivity analysis, which revealed that the ranking was subject to a systematic ranking that is supported by high correlation results over different scenarios with variations in the weights of criteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据