4.7 Article

BBRv2+: Towards balancing aggressiveness and fairness with delay-based bandwidth probing

期刊

COMPUTER NETWORKS
卷 206, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2022.108789

关键词

Congestion control; BBR; BBRv2

资金

  1. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [JQ20024]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [U20A20180, 62072437]
  3. CAS-Austria Joint Project [171111KYSB20200001]
  4. Emilia-Romagna region (Italy), POR-FESR 2018-2020 Project LiBER
  5. Macao Polytechnic Institute project [RP/ESCA-01/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces BBRv2 and its improved version BBRv2+, analyzes their performance under different network conditions, and demonstrates the advantages of BBRv2+ over BBRv2. BBRv2+ achieves faster responsiveness to bandwidth dynamics and fairness towards CCAs by using delay information, and improves resilience to random losses and network jitter through integrated mechanisms.
BBRv2, proposed by Google, aims at addressing BBR's shortcomings of unfairness against loss-based congestion control algorithms (CCAs) and excessive retransmissions in shallow-buffered networks. In this paper, we first comprehensively study BBRv2's performance under various network conditions and show that BBRv2 mitigates the shortcomings of BBR. Nevertheless, BBRv2's benefits come with several costs, including slow responsiveness to bandwidth dynamics and low resilience to random losses. We then propose BBRv2+ to address BBRv2's performance issues without sacrificing its advantages over BBR. To this end, BBRv2+ uses delay information to cautiously guide the aggressiveness of its bandwidth probing. In doing so, it achieves fast responsiveness to bandwidth dynamics and fairness against loss-based CCAs at the same time. BBRv2+ also integrates mechanisms for improved resilience to random losses and network jitter. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of BBRv2+. Specifically, it achieves 25% higher throughput and comparable queuing delay in comparison with BBRv2 in high-mobility network scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据