4.7 Article

Repairing sharp delamination cracks in CFRP through capillary action of acetone-diluted resin solution

期刊

COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 219, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109249

关键词

Carbon fibers A; Delamination B; X-ray computed tomography D; Capillary action; Composites repair

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council [201806680049]
  2. Harbin Engineering University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Repairing shape delamination cracks in carbon fiber composites using acetone-diluted resin solutions was successful, with 30% resin solution proving to be the most effective for a 7-day curing time. Even the least favorable repair condition of 5% resin solution showed significantly improved repair results after 21 and 42 days of curing. X-ray scanning was used to reveal the internal delamination both before and after repair.
Shape delamination cracks in carbon fiber composites were successfully repaired utilizing the capillary action of acetone-diluted resin solutions (without hardener). Resin pre-coating (RPC) solutions with 5, 10, 15, 30 and 45 wt% resin were tested and their repair effectiveness were compared. Resin curing inside narrow delamination cracks was achieved by applying the normal resin/hardener mixture at the open delamination edge so the hardening process could take place inside the resin-filled delamination cracks with time. Compressive tests were performed after 7, 21 and 42 days of repair to study the influence of curing period. The edge delamination was introduced through light impact at the edge of CFRPs panels. Compressive failure loads after repair showed that the 30 wt% of RPC solution yielded the most favorable repair result for the 7-day curing time. With 21- and 42day curing times, even the least favorable repair condition of 5 wt% of the RPC solution produced significantly improved repair results. X-ray scanning was used to reveal the internal delamination before and after repair.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据