4.7 Article

Effects of inter-ply mismatch angle on interlaminar properties and their influence in numerical simulations

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106795

关键词

Laminates; Delamination; Damage mechanics; Numerical analysis

资金

  1. Agency for Science, Technology and Research (Singapore) [A19C1a0044 (WP 1-1), WBS R-265000-673-305]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interlaminar shear strength and mode II fracture toughness of carbon-epoxy laminates decrease as the inter-ply mismatch angle increases. Delamination tends to form more easily at interfaces with larger mismatch angles, leading to lower delamination resistance in multi-directional laminate plates. Applying interlaminar properties obtained from unidirectional samples may result in erroneous predictions for the simulation of multi-directional laminates.
In this study, the interlaminar shear strength and mode II fracture toughness of carbon-epoxy laminates with respect to different inter-ply mismatch angles are determined and shown to generally decrease as inter-ply mismatch angle increases. Despite this dependency, most numerical simulations of multi-directional laminates involving delamination adopt interlaminar properties measured from unidirectional laminates only. Using the derived angle-dependent shear strength and fracture toughness, computational simulations of short-beam shear and out-of-plane loading of multi-directional laminate plates were performed and compared with physical experiments. It is shown that delamination tends to form intensively at interfaces with larger mismatch angles where delamination resistance is lower. This characteristic is captured by assigning interlaminar properties corresponding to the inter-ply mismatch angles in the numerical simulation. The practice of applying interlaminar properties obtained from tests on unidirectional samples may lead to erroneous predictions of varying severity for the simulation of multi-directional laminates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据