4.7 Article

Synergistically enhancing electromagnetic interference shielding performance and thermal conductivity of polyvinylidene fluoride-based lamellar film with MXene and graphene

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106945

关键词

A; Polymer-matrix composites A; Layered structure B; Electrical properties B; Thermal properties

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFA0706802]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51903223, 12072325]
  3. Key Technologies R&D Program of Henan Province [212102210302]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A synergistic effect strategy is proposed in this study to construct a directly contacted conductive network in polymer layered film by utilizing MXene and graphene nanoplates. The composite film achieved synergistic enhancements in electrical conductivity, EMI shielding effectiveness, and in-plane thermal conductivity.
Polymer-based layered conductive films used in electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding and thermal management applications face a huge challenge of high contact electrical/thermal interfacial resistance. In this work, synergistic effect strategy between MXene and graphene nanoplates (GNP) is put forward to construct a directly contacted conductive network in polymer layered film. In detail, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)-based layered films were prepared by the scalable blade-coating process. Under the above synergistic effect, a directly contacted in-plane electrical/thermal conduction network was obtained in the composite film. As a result, the MXene/GNP-PVDF composite film reveals both synergistic enhancements in electrical conductivity, EMI shielding effectiveness (SE) and in-plane thermal conductivity with the optimal values of 7423 S/m, 36.3 dB and 36.9 W/m K, respectively, which exceed those of the composite films with only MXene or GNP. Therefore, this work provides a simple synergistic strategy for the design and preparation of multifunctional EMI shielding and thermal management films.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据