4.7 Article

Foreign object damage and post-impact tensile behavior of plain-woven SiC/SiC composites

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 295, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115767

关键词

Ceramic matrix composites (CMCs); Foreign object damage (FOD); Residual strength; Digital image correlation (DIC); Ballistic impact

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project [Y2019-I-0018-0017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the impact damage and penetration mechanisms of CVI-fabricated SiC/SiC composite plates through impact testing and microscopic observation, and explored the effect of FOD on the tensile behavior of the composite material.
Plain-woven SiC/SiC composite plates, fabricated using the chemical vapor infiltration (CVI) technology, were impact-tested at different velocities using 3-mm-diameter steel spheres. The states of the impacted targets were divided into three categories: surface damage, critical penetration, and full penetration. The microstructures of the foreign object damage (FOD) in the targets were carefully observed using microscope and X-ray computerized tomography (CT) scans. Based on the results of the observations, the forms of impact damage of ceramic matrix composites (CMCs), including cone cracking, yarn fracture and bending, and delamination, are revealed and summarized. The mechanisms of the penetration process were further analyzed by combining these damage modes of the CMCs. Subsequently, tensile tests of the impacted specimens were performed to investigate the effect of FOD on the tensile behavior of the CMCs. The digital image correlation (DIC) method was used to obtain the strain distribution of the impacted targets during tension. The tensile curves of the undamaged and impacted specimens were obtained and compared. The evolution of the tensile failure of the damaged beams was then analyzed. Finally, the residual strengths of CMC plates impacted at different velocities were compared.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据