4.7 Article

Behaviour of hybrid glass fibre-reinforced polymer and timber composite laminates under shear loading: Importance of fibre rotation

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 287, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115304

关键词

Hybrid glass fibre reinforced polymer-timber laminates; Finite element modelling; Shear behaviour; Fibre rotation modelling

资金

  1. Australian Research Council under the Industry Transformation Research Hub funding scheme [IH200100010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the behavior of hybrid glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) timber composite laminates under shear loading. Experimental tests and numerical simulations were conducted to determine the properties of the laminates and explore the influence of fiber rotation on their behavior.
This paper presents a study aimed at investigating the behaviour of hybrid glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP)timber (HFT) composite laminates under shear loading. A series of V-notched rail shear tests were carried out to determine the properties of HFT laminates, both in perpendicular and parallel to timber grain direction. In addition, shear tests were also conducted for pure timber and GFRP specimens. Except for pure timber specimens loaded parallel to grains, all specimens showed significant non-linear behaviour. During the testing, significant rotation of the glass fibres was observed. To further investigate the behaviour of the shear test specimens, a numerical model was developed. A numerical simulation approach that combines the progressive damage modelling of GFRP and timber with advanced fibre rotation modelling was developed. The simulation approach was implemented in finite element (FE) software program ABAQUS\Explicit via a vectorized user-defined material model (VUMAT). FE results showed a good agreement with the test results and confirmed the significant influence of fibre rotation on the post peak behaviour of the HFT specimens under shear loading.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据